- From: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 22:04:07 +0000
- To: Tavmjong Bah <tavmjong@free.fr>
- CC: "CSS WWW Style (www-style@w3.org)" <www-style@w3.org>
Tav, In today’s CSSWG meeting, we discussed the work you started in Inkscape on flowing text into an arbitrary shape, and how that is or is not impacted by our postponing shape-inside to level 2 of CSS Shapes. I know we had an in-person conversation about this, but the only written-down reference I could find was from a blog post of yours where I commented: http://tavmjong.free.fr/blog/?p=938 My position there (and now) was that there shouldn’t be an issue with working on shape-inside, because we intend to spec it out in CSS Shapes level 2. We’ve been contributing shape-inside code to WebKit and Blink alongside our level 1 work. I just think that we can make faster progress by finishing what’s in level 1 (particularly with a second implementation and a test suite) then working on the next level. Does this work for you, or would you like to argue for pulling shape-inside back into level 1? Thanks, Alan
Received on Wednesday, 8 January 2014 22:04:39 UTC