- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 09:31:28 -0800
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 01/08/2014 07:56 AM, 川幡 太一 wrote: > Dear fantasai, > >>> In <52CCE1C3.2080903@inkedblade.net>, >>> fantasai wrote: > >> The new CSS Ruby spec follows the HTML5 ruby model, and therefore the >> ruby-base-container element is no longer required to exist in the source. >> However, because an <rbc> element can exist, the display type exists. > > As far as current spec (http://darobin.github.io/html-ruby/) is > concerned, <rbc> element does not exist. (It does exists in XHTML Ruby, > though.) > >> Note also that for double-sided ruby, <rbc> is still required in HTML5 >> Ruby, to delineate the two sides. > > For double-sided ruby, I think not <rbc>, but <rtc> is necessary, as > follows. > > <ruby>Base<rtc>text A</rtc><rtc>text B</rtc></ruby> Sorry, you're right. I misread your email. :) I didn't remove the ruby-base-container element because a) it simplifies the layout abstraction to have a box that is parallel in construction to the ruby-text-container b) it allows a UA directly support XHTML ruby markup with only this one addition For HTML5 markup, the ruby-base-container is automatically generated and need never show up in the source as an element. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 8 January 2014 17:31:59 UTC