- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:46:54 -0800
- To: Viatcheslav Ostapenko <sl.ostapenko@samsung.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Viatcheslav Ostapenko <sl.ostapenko@samsung.com> wrote: > Hi, > > There is an issue raised in "CSS Positioned Layout Module Level 3" > Draft here: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-position/#sticky-positioning > > It is written like "Describe which element font-size-relative units > are resolved against". > > When sticky positioned elements are not offset, they should be > layouted and displayed exactly the same way as normal flow positioned > elements. When sticky positioned element is offsetted, only position of > the element changes, but all other properties should stay the same. > > In this case sticky positioned elements are very similar to relative > positioned elements. Since the section describing relative positioned > elements doesn't have any special clarification about font-size-relative > units resolving, I think sticky positioned elements section also doesn't > need this. In both cases font-size-relative units resolved the same way > it is done for normal flow elements when sticky/relative positioning > offset is not taken into account. Agreed; stickypos is just relpos with magical offsets, and shouldn't have any weird effects with font-relative units or anything else. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 26 February 2014 22:47:42 UTC