- From: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:14:30 +1100
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 2:59 AM, Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com> wrote: >> According to the spec, it seems that all predefined styles except >> 'decimal' could be redefined by authors via @counter-style. My >> question is that, should the new defination affect other predefined >> styles depend on it? For example, if 'cjk-decimal' is redefined, >> should 'japanese-informal' fallback to the predefined 'cjk-decimal' or >> the new one? I prefer it to only depend on the name, which means the >> new one wins here. >> >> I think this behavior, including the redefinablity of predefined >> styles, should be clearly noted in section "'@counter-style' rule". > > Yes, it depends only on the name. This is already specified, in that > the 'fallback' descriptor only talks about names, and the normative > definitions of the various types all use the normal 'fallback' > descriptor. Nothing else needs to be said, normatively. > > I could add a note somewhere if you think it's unclear, though. If > you'd like this, where do you think it would be appropriate? I think the note should follow the paragraph with the term '<counter-style-name>' highlight. - Xidorn
Received on Monday, 24 February 2014 22:15:37 UTC