- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:01:52 +0000
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>
- CC: W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>, www International <www-international@w3.org>
The i18n WG believes that this issue has now been addressed and has closed the issue on our tracker system. Thank you. RI On 30/10/2013 17:48, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com> wrote: >> Hi Tab, >> >> Regarding: >> >>> Done, though I'm not sure what difference you think there is between >>> simplified and traditional. Other than the negative sign, both formals are >>> identical, as are both informals. >> >> The difference is between the two formals: >> >> zh-Hant: 9678 4EDF 96F6 58F9 >> zh-Hans: 9646 4EDF 96F6 58F9 >> >> Notice the simplified code point (U+9646) in the second one, as compared to the traditional code point (U+9678) in the first one. > > Whoops, sorry about that. My eyes deceived me, and I didn't catch > that the table of characters actually is different between simple and > traditional formal styles in a few characters. > > Fixed now. > > ~TJ >
Received on Friday, 14 February 2014 16:02:24 UTC