- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:14:53 -0800
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 01/23/2014 05:09 PM, Jens O. Meiert wrote: >>> * appearance, formerly at http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-ui/#appearance0 >> >> This I believe will need to be standardized with a 'none' and a >> not-'none' value. The others were not successful. No idea wrt >> spec status, Tantek's supposed to be dealing with this module. >> >>> * punctuation-trim, >>> * text-space-collapse, >>> * text-wrap, >> >> These were deferred to CSS Text L4. >> >>> * text-outline, formerly at http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-text/#text-outline >> >> This will be replaced with a spec defining the use of SVG's >> 'stroke' properties when applied to CSS. Also, text-shadow >> with a spread value (coming in L4) can have the same effect. > > Thanks Elika! With respect to pointing these out in a property > index/overview, which of these properties do you think should be > included, i.e. are “safe” to point to (keep pointing to, to be > precise)? Right now it seems likely that text-space-collapse and > text-wrap would make it, but how probable do you think it is that the > other three will make it? I wouldn't include any of the Text L4 stuff.' ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2014 01:15:22 UTC