Re: [css-flexbox] concepts of baselines

On 02/10/2014 03:44 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
> On Monday 2014-02-10 12:59 -0800, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:28 PM, L. David Baron <> wrote:
>>> has a bunch of
>>> text about how CSS 2.1 doesn't define the baseline of block and
>>> table boxes, etc.  However, it misses a distinction present in the
>>> underlying concepts.
>>> If CSS 2.1 defined a baseline, it would need to define *two*
>>> concepts of baseline, a last-line baseline concept used for
>>> inline-block and inline-table baseline alignment in
>>> (which also uses the bottom edge for overflow != visible, and which,
>>> for compatibility, uses the first row of a table), and a first-line
>>> baseline concept used for table cell baseline alignment in
>>> .
>> Just to make sure I'm reading this right, you're saying that we need
>> to define the last-line baseline for flexbox and the other things in
>> that section?
> Probably, at least if we agree that it's inline-table that's the
> exception rather than inline-block being the exception.  (I think we
> discussed this once, and I don't remember what the consensus was,
> although I tend towards thinking inline-block is the better
> behavior.)
> Although that spec clearly isn't the right place for the global
> definitions.

No, they'd probably go into css-align. :)


Received on Thursday, 13 February 2014 01:12:49 UTC