- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:49:22 -0800
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2014 16:49:50 UTC
On Feb 12, 2014 1:28 AM, "Daniel Glazman" < daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote: > > On 11/02/2014 21:52, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> >> I've just posted the selector syntax survey I was charged with at the >> last f2f: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1x0eXPBj1GN8Zau-7k9J_JGhoM6uGEqlJBkBBDFswT2w/viewform >> >> This will help us decide whether to use the subject indicator or the >> :has() pseudoclass. Please answer and share this poll! > > > The poll was originally started with a choice between !foo > a and > a:has(> foo) and then you changed it to ^foo > a and tthe :has() thing. > Most people have voted and commented against ! but this is not relevant > any more to ^... I suggest you reset your form and ask people to do > the survey again. We know exactly how many people voted before the change (130) and will keep that in mind when evaluating the results. (The results are sorted by time, so we know *which* votes were cast before the change as well.) ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2014 16:49:50 UTC