- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 11:01:24 +0000
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Pavel Curtis <pavelc@microsoft.com>
- CC: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On 06/02/2014 02:36, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > [please don't top-post http://wiki.csswg.org/tools/www-style] > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Pavel Curtis <pavelc@microsoft.com> wrote: >> Did the WG consider using the terms 'content rectangle', 'padding rectangle', etc. for the problematic foursome? > > It was suggested, but we didn't spend much time on thinking up names, > so no suggestion was seriously considered. > > "* rectangle" might be a decent answer, except that it's not actually > a rectangle when border-radius/Shapes are in effect. Well, it depends. For something like the background *painting* area, yes. But for the background *positioning* area, we really want a rectangle. That said, I think we can deal with that ambiguity without having separate terms. -- Simon Sapin
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2014 11:01:55 UTC