Re: Resolutions regarding fragments

[please don't top-post]

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Pavel Curtis <> wrote:
> Did the WG consider using the terms 'content rectangle', 'padding rectangle', etc. for the problematic foursome?

It was suggested, but we didn't spend much time on thinking up names,
so no suggestion was seriously considered.

"* rectangle" might be a decent answer, except that it's not actually
a rectangle when border-radius/Shapes are in effect.


Received on Thursday, 6 February 2014 02:37:34 UTC