Re: Resolutions regarding fragments from Tab Atkins Jr. on 2014-02-06 (www-style@w3.org from February 2014)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 18:36:46 -0800
To: Pavel Curtis <pavelc@microsoft.com>
Cc: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDCzBbQrbRD0RsKudNdJZh4g=KWtRJUGL-Pxyh_6WHst-w@mail.gmail.com>

[please don't top-post http://wiki.csswg.org/tools/www-style]

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Pavel Curtis <pavelc@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Did the WG consider using the terms 'content rectangle', 'padding rectangle', etc. for the problematic foursome?

It was suggested, but we didn't spend much time on thinking up names,
so no suggestion was seriously considered.

"* rectangle" might be a decent answer, except that it's not actually
a rectangle when border-radius/Shapes are in effect.

~TJ

Received on Thursday, 6 February 2014 02:37:34 UTC