- From: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 00:43:14 +0000
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: "<www-style@w3.org>" <www-style@w3.org>
On 2/5/14, 4:38 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote: >> The Serializing CSS Values section [1] seems to imply that all absolute >> lengths should be serialized in millimeter units: >> >> ---- >> Absolute lengths: the number of millimeters serialized as per >> <number> followed by the literal string "mm”. >> >> ---- >> >> I’m assuming this is incorrect - that serialization should use whatever >> units are appropriate (possibly the specified units, possibly normalized >> units via computed style, etc.) > >I think this might have been written back when "absolute lengths" >didn't refer to px. You're right that now it should use px as the >serialization unit. > >> This is followed by issue 10 that mentions a ‘rumor’ that I believe has >> been squashed. > >I don't even understand what it's talking about. <resolution> isn't a >length at all, relative or absolute. My guess is that it was about using ‘real’ inches and millimeters instead of CSS inches, etc. Thanks, Alan
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2014 00:43:55 UTC