- From: Mihai Balan <mibalan@adobe.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 17:54:22 +0000
- To: Rossen Atanassov <Rossen.Atanassov@microsoft.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Hi fantasai, Rossen, I finally managed to read through the initial thread about pathological fragmentation. You're right - it's basically the same problem. However, it's unclear to me what the conclusion at that point was. So I think it would be good to have a section in the fragmentation spec about how not to leave empty fragmentainers :) Thanks, m. Mihai Balan | Quality Engineer @ Web Engine team | mibalan@adobe.com | +4-031.413.3653 / x83653 | Adobe Systems Romania On 1/15/14 8:52 PM, "Rossen Atanassov" <Rossen.Atanassov@microsoft.com> wrote: >>We can certainly drop the sentence here but I don't think this will help >>anything. Mihai's interpretation suggests that empty regions >>(fragmentainers) are created due to fragmentation. "should content that >>doesn't fit in the small region create an empty region and be flowed in >>the big one?" - this behavior would suggest that a fragmentainer is left >>empty - to me this is the conversation we had about "pathological >>fragmentation" [1]. > >One criteria that I realize we're missing in this section is "Don't leave >fragmentainers empty". Mihai what do you think? > >Rossen > >[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0337.html
Received on Wednesday, 5 February 2014 17:54:56 UTC