On Feb 3, 2014, at 12:40 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com> wrote: >> However, I would like to do this expeditiously (days, not weeks), so that >> Blink is able to ship with the new names. > > To make this statement a little clearer: > > Chrome *will* be shipping Shadow DOM publicly (in conjunction with > Moz) in the *very near* future. Whatever API gets shipped will be > frozen almost immediately. If you want to suggest name changes, as we > brainstormed a bit at the f2f, do so RIGHT NOW or forever hold your > peace. So let's see: - This feature isn't in a mature specification - This feature is not even in a spec draft at all afaict (couldn't find it in Shadow DOM or Selectors editor's drafts) - No other browser ships it - No other browser even plans to ship it soon (notwithstanding your apparently inaccurate statement about Mozilla) - The relevant WG has disagreement over both the syntax and the semantics And you'd like to ship it within days and freeze it almost immediately. I find it surprising that this is considered consistent with the guidelines at <http://www.chromium.org/blink#compatibility>. Even if it somehow is, it seems to me the working group should not agree to freeze whatever syntax Chrome ships under these circumstances. Regards, MaciejReceived on Wednesday, 5 February 2014 02:16:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:37 UTC