- From: Leif Arne Storset <lstorset@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 17:18:06 +0100
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 4 February 2014 17:12, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote: > * fantasai wrote: >> RESOLVED: close issue 1 on regions. >> Noted that there was a formal objection from at least one person. > > Could somebody clarify what that issue is, exactly? None of the drafts I > checked identify an issue as "issue 1". There is > >> glazou: (reads earlier formulation from irc) >> 1) Disallow flow-from on elements. (What the issue says.) >> 2) Close the issue with no change - allow it to apply to elements >> and existing block pseudos, and allow it to apply to more >> pseudos when they get invented. >> 3) Allow it to apply to both, but don't close this issue until there's >> another method to create boxes. >> 2 3 2 2 - 2 2 2 - 2 2 2 (3) 2 2 - 2 2 1 2 - 2 2 2 >> the twoes have it >> glazou: declare a consensus >> RESOLVED: close issue 1 on regions. >> Bert: formal objection > > It then seems the actual decision was "allow [flow-from] to apply to > elements and existing block pseudos, and allow it to apply to more > pseudos when they get invented." Is that what Bert formally objects to, > assuming he is the one registering the objection? Yes, issue 16858 was closed with no change: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16858 -Leif
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2014 16:19:03 UTC