- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 17:51:36 +0100
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style\@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> Could somebody clarify what that issue is, exactly? None of the drafts I
> checked identify an issue as "issue 1". There is
>
> > glazou: (reads earlier formulation from irc)
> > 1) Disallow flow-from on elements. (What the issue says.)
> > 2) Close the issue with no change - allow it to apply to elements
> > and existing block pseudos, and allow it to apply to more
> > pseudos when they get invented.
> > 3) Allow it to apply to both, but don't close this issue until there's
> > another method to create boxes.
> > 2 3 2 2 - 2 2 2 - 2 2 2 (3) 2 2 - 2 2 1 2 - 2 2 2
> > the twoes have it
> > glazou: declare a consensus
> > RESOLVED: close issue 1 on regions.
> > Bert: formal objection
>
> It then seems the actual decision was "allow [flow-from] to apply to
> elements and existing block pseudos, and allow it to apply to more
> pseudos when they get invented." Is that what Bert formally objects to,
> assuming he is the one registering the objection?
Given the discussion in the minutes [1] and the fact that (roughly)
3.5 people were actively opposed to closing the bug [2], it seems
preposterous to declare consensus.
I support Bert's formal objection.
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0056.html
[2] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16858
-h&kon
Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Wednesday, 5 February 2014 16:52:17 UTC