- From: Shane Hudson <Shane@ShaneHudson.net>
- Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 00:51:20 +0000
- To: "Jens O. Meiert" <jens@meiert.com>
- Cc: W3C WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CANYFvNOhw4=2Uqvu2hEc97utP3yTxt4wPLsdKv1bfjf5iav6vw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Jens, I would refrain from using the term CSS4 personally since all CSS modules are now independently versioned. I'm not sure what the agreed consensus is, but I tend to just say CSS and refer to the particular specification if it is required. There are already many level 4 specs alongside the level 3 specs. Hope that helps, Shane On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 11:54 PM, Jens O. Meiert <jens@meiert.com> wrote: > Hey guys-- > > what does the group understand as "CSS 4"? Is this written down > somewhere? Would it mean something like "all of CSS 3, plus anything > marked 'CSS 4'," or would CSS 4 extend/duplicate all CSS 3 modules > when times are right? Or, are there considerations to move over to a > "living standard" model too, making "CSS 4" somewhat of an auxiliary > concept only for module versioning and such? > > Sorry if I missed prior conversations, and thanks for clarifying! > > (By the way, apart from concrete understanding my aim is to learn > enough to decide whether we need a "CSS 4" column in > <http://meiert.com/en/indices/css-properties/> or not. If you have a > view on that, please let me know.) > > Thanks! > Jens. > > -- > Jens O. Meiert > http://meiert.com/en/ > > -- ------------------------------ Shane Hudson (Website Developer - www.ShaneHudson.net<http://www.shanehudson.net/> ) 07794746595 @ShaneHudson <https://twitter.com/#!/ShaneHudson> / +Shane Hudson<https://plus.google.com/u/0/110111510059204475260>
Received on Monday, 3 February 2014 00:52:11 UTC