- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 00:52:17 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20141231055217.GA6969@crum.dbaron.org>
On Tuesday 2014-12-30 21:36 -0800, fantasai wrote: > On 12/30/2014 06:49 AM, L. David Baron wrote: > >On Tuesday 2014-12-30 00:02 -0800, fantasai wrote: > >>On 12/28/2014 09:36 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote: > >>>Are logical properties set by the 'all' shorthand? > >> > >>Yes. > > > >I'm not so sure they should be. > > Why would they not be? (1) I don't see any reason that they need to be, since setting the physical properties is enough to set everything to 'inherit' or 'initial'. (2) If they are, then you have to answer the questions about which order they come in. The OM aspects of that are a bit unpleasant; depending on how 'inherit' is defined for logical properties, the inheritance aspects might be worse (although I hope the logical aspect gets resolved first, and inheritance after). There are probably arguments on the other side too, though. -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense. - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)
Received on Wednesday, 31 December 2014 05:52:43 UTC