- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:30:08 -0800
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 04/24/2014 12:55 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote: > On 04/24/2014 12:37 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org> wrote: >>> I suggest renaming the "Grid Layout Algorithm" section to "Track sizing >>> algorithm" >> >> Done. We moved Intrinsic Sizes to the section talking about grid containers. > > Hmm. One problem with this -- there was actually already a section > implicitly labeled the "track sizing algorithm" (and linked to, using > that term) -- halfway through section 10.2, there's the statement: > "The remainder of this section is the track sizing algorithm" > which is the link target > > Also, earlier in Section 10.2, the spec still uses the (now undefined) > term "grid layout algorithm", and lists "track sizing algorithm" as > being a sub-step of that algorithm which is repeated several times. > (which feels a bit odd inside of a section whose title is the same as > that sub-step's name) > > So: it still seems like we might need a term to describe the broader > algorithm (in which the "track sizing algorithm" is already a defined > substep). Or perhaps we should rename the substep. Okay, we renamed the top-level Section 10 as "Grid Sizing Algorithm". Let us know if there is something awkward about this. :) ~fantasai and TJ
Received on Friday, 19 December 2014 01:30:46 UTC