On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org> wrote: > The 'stack' value of grid-auto-flow is currently defined as: > >> The auto-placement algorithm is run with a single hypothetical 1×1 >> grid item, as if grid-auto-flow: row or grid-auto-flow: column were >> specified, depending on whether row or column is specified alongside >> it, respectively. If neither row nor column are specified, it >> defaults to running the algorithm as if grid-auto-flow: row were >> specified. >> >> Wherever the hypothetical item would be placed, > > > The item is 1×1, so this is a 1×1 grid area. > >> all auto-placed items are placed there, stacked atop one another. >> (This happens even if the auto-placed item is greater than 1×1, even >> if doing so would cause it to overlap explicitly-placed grid items.) > > > What does "there" mean for items bigger than 1×1? > > I suggest: all auto-placed items are placed, stacked atop one another, at a > grid position determined from the grid-column-start and grid-row-start > values of the hypothetical item, but keep their (explicit, implicit, or > defaulted) grid span. The item’s grid-column-end and grid-row-end values > will only match that of the hypothetical item if the grid span is 1 in the > corresponding direction. fantasai, Rossen, and I decided to remove 'stack' entirely, because it's a dumb value. Unless the WG objects, we consider this issues resolved. ^_^ ~TJReceived on Friday, 19 December 2014 01:12:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:49 UTC