- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:07:07 -0800
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, Manuel Rego Casasnovas <rego@igalia.com>
On 11/02/2014 10:20 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 3:26 AM, François REMY wrote: >> ISSUE 2: >> >> ============= >> >> In Chrome, the “margin” of the second <grid-item> is taken into account to >> compute the breadth of the second row. I think it makes sense, but I’ve no >> idea whether or not we should do this. I’m under the impression the spec >> says we should use the “min-content” size of the grid item to compute the >> track breadth, which (I believe) doesn’t contain the margin (so my >> implementation doesn’t yield something great, here). >> >> FWIW, IE agrees with Chrome here and use the vertical margin as part of the >> auto-sizing. I’m probably going to change my implementation to match, but I >> wonder if the specs really says that. > > Ah, I think we don't explicitly state that you want the "outer" > contribution. I'll fix. The contribution is, by definition, the outer size. See, e.g. # The min-content block-size contribution and max-content block-size # contribution of a block-level box is the block-size of the block # after layout, plus any block-axis margin, border, and padding. in Sizing. ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 18 December 2014 20:07:45 UTC