Re: [css-align] 2 issues / comments on the specification

On 02/03/2014 03:34 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>
> Somewhat unrelated, I note that 'flex-start/end' are defined to be
> "equivalent to" start in a non-flex context.  We should probably just
> compute them to start instead; doing so relies on information that is
> generally okay to deal with in computed values (just the 'display' of
> the element's parent).

I'm not sure about this. I agree it seems very straightforward, but didn't
we run into a problem with looking at 'display' of the element's parent
during the flexbox cycle?

Pinging Mozilla folks, since it was their issue.

~fantasai

Received on Wednesday, 17 December 2014 03:33:12 UTC