W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2014

Re: [css-align] 2 issues / comments on the specification

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 19:32:32 -0800
Message-ID: <5490F950.5000506@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org, Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
On 02/03/2014 03:34 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> Somewhat unrelated, I note that 'flex-start/end' are defined to be
> "equivalent to" start in a non-flex context.  We should probably just
> compute them to start instead; doing so relies on information that is
> generally okay to deal with in computed values (just the 'display' of
> the element's parent).

I'm not sure about this. I agree it seems very straightforward, but didn't
we run into a problem with looking at 'display' of the element's parent
during the flexbox cycle?

Pinging Mozilla folks, since it was their issue.

Received on Wednesday, 17 December 2014 03:33:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:49 UTC