- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 19:23:00 -0800
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>
- CC: CSS WG <www-style@w3.org>
On 09/16/2014 02:27 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 1:57 PM, François REMY > <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com> wrote: >>> Yes, 'stretch' doesn't do anything if the item is >>> larger than the area, which is why IE renders >>> the way it does. >> >> Thanks, this is much clearer than the spec. > > Hmm, it should be exactly what the spec says. Can I fix the spec to > be clearer somehow? We've reworked some of the text to be clearer about this. >>> Yes, our handling of clamping is not great right now. >>> Obviously things need to get clamped in the middle >>> there, so that if a max-* prevents it from reaching >>> its full stretched size, it should still stretch as much >>> as possible, and then start-align. >>> >>> I'll add an issue on it for now. >> >> That slightly bothers me, though. I can clearly see cases where you would want to center the element if it can't grow to fit, and not start-align it. > > This is basically just copied from Flexbox; no one's asked for > fallback values yet. This is now listed as an issue. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 17 December 2014 03:24:06 UTC