- From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 10:23:06 +0100
- To: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>
- Cc: Daniel Weck <daniel.weck@gmail.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, fantasai <fantasai@inkedblade.net>
> On 04 Dec 2014, at 03:45, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com> wrote: > > On Dec 3, 2014, at 6:20 AM, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> wrote: >> >> What would you think (naming aside) about a media feature like this: >> speech: none | linear | screen-based > > Linear seems like a logical match for the existing media type, but it's still not mutually exclusive. For example, iOS includes a "Speak Screen" feature that effectively linearizes an iBooks EPUB (including turning the pages), but you can pause the output or change the speech speed. > Perhaps: > > speech: none | linear | screen | linear-screen; > > "@media (speech: screen)" could match screen readers, zoom utils with speech, and linear-screen would match something more like the "Speak Screen" or "Speak Selected Text" features. Seems like this might not match a screen reader where speech was off temporarily or permanently (e.g. a deaf-blind user with a refreshable Braille display) Not sure I completely follow you. Do you mean that linear-screen is kind of like linear, except with pauses after each screen/page, as some sort of audio pagination? Could you explain a bit more the differences between the modes? > This property might need to be subject to the privacy model we've been discussing. Agreed. - Florian
Received on Thursday, 4 December 2014 09:23:35 UTC