- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 09:24:44 -0800
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 3 December 2014 17:25:20 UTC
On Monday 2014-11-24 13:00 -0800, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 8:09 AM, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> wrote: > > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-overflow-3/#overflow-properties > > > > CSS overflow states that the if one of 'overflow-x' and 'overflow-y' has a specified value of 'visible', and there other has a specified value of one of the scrolling values (hidden, scroll or auto), the scrolling value computes to itself, and ‘visible' computes to ‘hidden’ > > > > However, browsers interoperably (checked Firefox, Chrome, Safari and Presto Opera) have ‘visible’ compute to ‘auto’ in that situation. > > As they should. Having visible overflow that also overflows in the > other dimension and thus is cut off by an invisible line is visually > confusing. Yeah, not sure why I wrote 'hidden' there. Fixed: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/8eabbb25d144 -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense. - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)
Received on Wednesday, 3 December 2014 17:25:20 UTC