Re: [selectors] applying pseudo classes to the label based on the labeled control from Florian Rivoal on 2014-12-02 (www-style@w3.org from December 2014)

From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 22:01:39 +0100
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-Id: <89B5DDCC-498E-4BF3-B128-AAF91525FAA1@rivoal.net>

> On 02 Dec 2014, at 18:55, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 02 Dec 2014 14:08:58 +0100, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
>> wrote:
>>> Wondering how much extensibility we’d actually lose if we didn’t go
>>> through the host language hook.
>> 
>> We can define :for() as a host language hook.
> 
> Yeah, that was definitely the assumed intent.  What other elements a
> given element is "for" is host-language specific.

What would the semantic be? "Label associated with a labeled control as per HTML, an whatever else the host language wants”, or something more meaningful?

 - Florian

Received on Tuesday, 2 December 2014 21:02:04 UTC