- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2014 21:55:40 -0700
- To: Lea Verou <lea@verou.me>
- Cc: Sylvain Galineau <galineau@adobe.com>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Lea Verou <lea@verou.me> wrote: > On Aug 11, 2014, at 04:31, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >> Minus the "50% switch" behavior > > Speaking of which, I’m not sure this was a good idea: > a) How are we going to explain animation-timing-function which switches immediately? What about transition and its longhands? It seems more consistent to say the switch occurs immediately, unless changed by a timing-function (how would that work? In any case, authors need to be able to tweak *when* the switch happens, *especially* with transitions, otherwise this change will bring more harm than good). I don't know what you mean by this. The "50%" is 50% progress through the timing function. You can tweak that to your heart's content, and make the switch happen anywhere from the beginning to the end. > b) If the switch occurs immediately, this has no effect in transitions unless a timing-function was used to change it, which minimizes the backwards compat issues we’re discussing even more. A timing function always applies. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 11 August 2014 04:56:32 UTC