On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: > On Aug 4, 2014, at 8:10 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >> [tangent alert!] >> >> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Now if only we could actually use W3C recommendations like MathML in W3C >>> specifications... :) >> >> I am *this close* to adding MathJax or something similar to Bikeshed's >> output (only doing so when you use a properly-marked formula). Would >> LaTeX work for you? > > Note that the W3C process requires scripts to be on the W3C server for TR specs. The FXTF uses MathJax in at least two specs. Sharing a maintained copy of MathJax in the TR domain would be great. Indeed. > Btw. Why requiring one format? Why not supporting all input formats of MathJax? Ah, I didn't realize it allowed MathML! ~TJReceived on Monday, 4 August 2014 22:17:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:51:37 UTC