On Friday 2014-04-25 12:00 -0700, L. David Baron wrote: > On Friday 2014-04-25 11:27 -0700, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 1:40 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > > > There are multiple places in > > > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-counter-styles/ where 'infinity' is used > > > as a keyword value of the range descriptor, despite the valid value > > > of that descriptor being 'infinite'. > > > > > > I believe some selective search-and-replace is needed. (There are > > > some occurrences of infinity that are not keywords, and thus ok.) > > > > Or should I switch the keywords to "infinity", since apparently my > > fingers are convinced that's what it should be? > > I thought about suggesting that, but 'infinity' seems a little > awkward as a keyword that can mean either positive or negative > infinity depending on context, whereas 'infinite' seems a little > less awkward in that role. Oh, and 'animation-iteration-count' already uses 'infinite', so I think we're better off being consistent and not using 'infinite' in some places in CSS and 'infinity' in others. -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense. - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)Received on Friday, 25 April 2014 19:08:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:39 UTC