- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 08:10:50 -0700
- To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >> We're currently missing a grammar combinator in CSS's property grammar syntax. >> >> We can express "exactly one" as "a | b", and we can express 5 of the 6 >> possibilities in {0+, 1+, all}×{in order, any order}* . The one thing >> we're missing is "1+, in order", which we can't write without >> duplication and honestly confusing grammar. > > More syntax possibilities: > > * A // combinator - it looks similar to ||, which is good, because > they both occupy the "1+" row in the table. I think zcorpan offhand-suggested this in chat: a >> combinator. It seems to indicate that ordering is important, which is nice. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 24 April 2014 15:11:37 UTC