- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 08:08:58 -0700
- To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:54 PM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: >> On Apr 24, 2014, at 4:20 AM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >>> We're currently missing a grammar combinator in CSS's property grammar syntax. >>> >>> We can express "exactly one" as "a | b", and we can express 5 of the 6 >>> possibilities in {0+, 1+, all}×{in order, any order}* . The one thing >>> we're missing is "1+, in order", which we can't write without >>> duplication and honestly confusing grammar. >> >> More syntax possibilities: >> >> * A // combinator - it looks similar to ||, which is good, because >> they both occupy the "1+" row in the table. > > This could be confused with || if a spec uses an italic font style. Why would you use italics on a grammar block? But point taken. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 24 April 2014 15:09:46 UTC