- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 09:37:44 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 04/23/2014 02:45 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote: > > On Apr 23, 2014, at 9:21 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > >> On 04/12/2014 01:56 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote: >>> Hi fantasai, >>> >>> To LC issue 9 of CSS Masking: >>> >>> On Dec 11, 2013, at 11:46 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >>> >>>> 8. Does 'mask-source-type' apply to 'mask-box-image-source'? >>>> It's not clear from the spec. (See editorial issue #8, of >>>> which this seems to be a symptom.) >>>> [...] >>> >>> I restructured the sections and hierarchies per your suggestions in other mails. >>> >>> 1) mask-type is now part of the positioned masks section, >>> 2) mask-source-type is now part of the SVG Mask Sources section. >>> >>> Both properties state for which kind of masking they are designed for. >>> >>> Does this address your concerns? >> >> Looks pretty good. >> >> There was one issue not addressed: given we have 'mask-type', >> do we need a 'mask-box-type property? > > Probably. Do you think we should add it? I've no idea. :) Ask the WG? ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2014 16:38:12 UTC