On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:20 AM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> > wrote: > > On Tuesday 2014-04-15 13:43 -0400, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > >> Currently > >> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-images-3/#the-image-orientation is > >> explicitly specified to not affect background images. However, a > >> use case was brought up that really wants orientation based on EXIF > >> metadata for backgrounds: user-provided wallpapers in web apps. > >> > >> I'm not saying we should make image-orientation apply to > >> backgrounds, but we need some mechanism (e.g. via image()?) for > >> having backgrounds that respect EXIF metadata... > > > > I think the way that fits best with other plans is probably adding > > an argument to the image() function (also in css-images). > > I agree. The question is just what to name the value. We can't use > from-image, as it's too generic. Maybe rotation-from-image? > auto-rotate? native-orientation? > Can't you just make it the default behavior with image()? I think everyone would want the EXIF data to be honored.Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2014 20:33:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:39 UTC