- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:17:58 -0700
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:20 AM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > On Tuesday 2014-04-15 13:43 -0400, Boris Zbarsky wrote: >> Currently >> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-images-3/#the-image-orientation is >> explicitly specified to not affect background images. However, a >> use case was brought up that really wants orientation based on EXIF >> metadata for backgrounds: user-provided wallpapers in web apps. >> >> I'm not saying we should make image-orientation apply to >> backgrounds, but we need some mechanism (e.g. via image()?) for >> having backgrounds that respect EXIF metadata... > > I think the way that fits best with other plans is probably adding > an argument to the image() function (also in css-images). I agree. The question is just what to name the value. We can't use from-image, as it's too generic. Maybe rotation-from-image? auto-rotate? native-orientation? ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2014 20:18:46 UTC