Re: [css-masking] lc issue 8: clip-rule

Hi fantasai,

On Dec 17, 2013, at 12:30 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:

> On 12/13/2013 11:27 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>> 
>> On Dec 13, 2013, at 8:09 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> On Dec 11, 2013, at 11:46 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>  7. clip-rule is not defined. At all. There's some syntax, an explanation
>>>>>     of how the two values differ, and an example, but no definition
>>>>>     of what the property actually *does*.
>>>> 
>>>> I put the explanation into the example [1]. Examples are normative.
>>> 
>>> Examples are informative.
>> 
>> Thanks for the clarification.
>> 
>> The definition of clip-rule is still complete. fill-rule is normatively
>> referenced. It is said that UAs must follow what fill-rule does and there
>> is a normative paragraph that clip-rule just applies to descendants of
>> the <clipPath> element.
> 
> I can infer that 'evenodd' and 'nonzero' on 'clip-rule' are interpreted
> analogously to 'fill-rule', but nothing says how it is interpreted for
> clipping. Nothing says that it applies to the clipping path, for example,
> as opposed to some other polygon.
> 
> You need a real definition here.

I added normative tests describing what even odd and nonzero aim to do and explained that this is effecting the shape use in the clipping region [1]. The actual algorithm is referenced from SVG 1.1. Please tell me if you still believe that this is not sufficient enough.[2]

Greetings,
Dirk

[1] http://dev.w3.org/fxtf/css-masking-1/#the-clip-rule
[2] http://dev.w3.org/fxtf/masking/issues-lc-2013.html#issue-8



> 
> ~fantasai
>

Received on Saturday, 12 April 2014 06:06:05 UTC