On Apr 2, 2014, at 6:07 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > On Friday 2014-03-21 00:38 +0000, Sylvain Galineau wrote: >> Given the following animation: >> >> @keyframes testing { >> 100% { >> width: 1000px; >> background-color: red; >> } >> 100% { >> width: 100px; >> background-color: yellow; >> } >> 100% { >> background-color: blue; >> } >> 100% { >> height: 400px; >> } >> } >> >> ...what happens between 0% and 100%? > > Some previous discussions on this topic: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0381.html > which spawned a subthread of the larger thread with subject > "multiple 'animation-name' and cascading" > and includes a use case in > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0387.html > > teleconference minutes at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0572.html > which resulted in a resolution: > RESOLVED: keyframe rules cascade > and also an action item: > https://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/actions/544 > to propose how the DOM API should deal with it. > > So I suppose the problem here is that the animations spec editors, > myself included, are behind on editing in resolutions (and also > don't have a good way to go through all teleconference minutes to > find relevant resolutions). (I have a list of resolutions that I > need to edit in, but this one wasn't on it.) > Thanks for finding this. I missed both this meeting and this resolution.Received on Thursday, 3 April 2014 14:35:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:41 UTC