W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2013

Re: [matrix][cssom-view] DOMPoint, DOMPointLiteral definitions

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 12:43:52 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDDRyY3e_+cc9TGsAmD1oYSh3+nRv5DmiR6m2oMeRqoANg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Cc: "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote:
> On Sep 30, 2013, at 8:48 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote:
>> They are live but immutable. That is at least my interpretation of the expected behavior from SVG. Even if they change, they can not be set by the author.
>> "Live" is by definition not immutable. "Immutable" means that something never changes after it is created.
> So we either need to accept that SVG DOM can make attributes "unsetable" in certain cases or make animVal return a real immutable DOMRect (or DOMPoint/DOMMatrix).

As Roc has already said, live readonly things would just be DOMRect.

Received on Monday, 30 September 2013 19:44:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:32 UTC