- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 13:52:49 -0700
- To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Cc: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: > On Sep 27, 2013, at 10:06 PM, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote: >> rectangle() = rectangle( <arg>, <arg>, <arg>, <arg> [, <arg>]? [, <arg>]? ) >> <arg> = <length>|<percentage> >> >> Would that be satisfactory? > > <arg> will be a specific type and we should agree on a specific name since this is a global definition affecting all specs. In general yes, that would be possible. Ah, right, I just assumed that was a placeholder. We don't currently have a way to declare that a type definition is "local" to some other definition. I need to come up with something for this, though. (The problem is that it's both a "type" and a "value" definition, which is weird right now.) ~TJ
Received on Friday, 27 September 2013 20:53:36 UTC