W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2013

[css-ruby] Anonymous Ruby Box Generation

From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 14:10:07 +0100
Message-ID: <5242E0AF.7070009@w3.org>
To: W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>, "CJK discussion (public-i18n-cjk@w3.org)" <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>
[resending with improved subject line - please reply to this version only]

On 25/09/2013 13:53, Richard Ishida wrote:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-ruby/#box-fixup
> 2.2. Anonymous Ruby Box Generation
>
> I'm having a little trouble understanding how this works such that we
> end up with all ruby layout structures properly parented.
>
> [1]
> If the ruby markup is
>
> <ruby>振<rt>ふ</rt>り<rt>り</rt>仮<rt>が</rt>名<rt>な</rt></ruby>
>
> How do the base characters get anonymous ruby-base boxes?
>
>
>
> [2]
> If the ruby markup is
>
> <ruby><rb>振<rb>り<rb>仮<rb>名<rt>ふ<rt>り</rt><rt>が<rt>な</ruby>
>
> step 3 says
>
> "Within each ruby base container, each sequence of inline-level boxes is
> wrapped in an anonymous ruby base box"
>
> Shouldn't this say:
>
> "Within each ruby base container, each of the inline-level boxes is
> wrapped in an anonymous ruby base box"
>
> since the sequence is equivalent to the ruby base container by the
> definition in step 2.
>
>
>
> [3]
> If the ruby markup is
>
> <ruby><rb>振<span>り</span>仮名<rt>annotations</ruby>
>
> wouldn't step 3 produce 3 ruby bases where only one was intended?
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 25 September 2013 13:10:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:34 UTC