On Sep 23, 2013, at 9:30 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: >> Why do we need both DOMPoint and DOMPointLiteral? > > DOMPointLiteral exists so that you can call methods that expect points > without having to wrap it in a verbose DOMPoint() constructor at > call-time. > > That is, you can say "el.transformPoint({x:5, y:10})" instead of > "el.transformPoint(new DOMPoint(5, 10))". How do you specify that without having two transformPoint() definitions, one with a DOMPoint argument and the other with a DOMPointLiteral argument? Greetings, Dirk > > ~TJReceived on Tuesday, 24 September 2013 10:26:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:34 UTC