- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 22:50:46 -0700
- To: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- CC: W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>
On 09/20/2013 12:40 AM, John Daggett wrote: > > At the F2F last week it was resolved that the CSSWG publish a LC > working draft of CSS3 Writing Modes [1]. But the spec still contains > five issues. Before publishing those should be addressed/fixed/removed > depending upon what's appropriate. > > # Issue 4: The WG would appreciate a better (more obvious / easier to > # type) name for this, if anyone can come up with one. > > Given that MS is shipping a prefixed property with this name I don't > think it's appropriate at this point to open up a big naming debate. I > would suggest that this issue be closed. And EPUB/WebKit is shipping a prefixed property with a different name. If someone comes up with something brilliant, I'd appreciate a better standard name, the current one isn't super clear imho. We had the directional naming issue open for many many years with no hope, and did eventually come up with a better solution. > The HTML source of the spec also includes a slew of old property > values and outdated spec text. If this is really the LC version of > this spec, that stuff should be trimmed out I think to avoid confusion. Done. > I also don't think the 'digits' value should be marked at-risk. It's marked at-risk because it wasn't in any of the EPUB profiles, and thus has fewer implementations. Until MS implemented, we didn't have any. I'm happy to remove if it's really a problem, but putting things in the at-risk list isn't generally a problem. > Other small editorial comments: > > - include the 15 Nov 2012 WD under previous drafts > - remove the <br> in the abstract > - appendix A needs to include the 'Vertical Orientation' property Done. ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 24 September 2013 05:51:14 UTC