- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 21:25:20 -0700
- To: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- CC: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>, W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>
On 09/23/2013 06:39 PM, John Daggett wrote: > > Revisit the discussion, yes, add possible future normative > requirements in the form of a note, no. Nobody is adding future requirements, we are pointing out that the normative requirements may change as a result of revisiting the discussion. However since you are seriously disturbed by this note, I've removed it and replaced it with your wording. Koji Ishii wrote: > > If I understand correctly, didn't you mention (or agreed?) that if fonts > that are affected by the removed wording, such as Adobe Ming Std, become > majority, we may revisit the discussion? It looks to me that the text > describe such situation very well. This was my understanding as well, and is recorded in the minutes here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0091.html ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 24 September 2013 04:25:49 UTC