Re: note about disabling font-variant

On 09/23/2013 06:39 PM, John Daggett wrote:
>
> Revisit the discussion, yes, add possible future normative
> requirements in the form of a note, no.

Nobody is adding future requirements, we are pointing out that
the normative requirements may change as a result of revisiting
the discussion.

However since you are seriously disturbed by this note, I've
removed it and replaced it with your wording.

Koji Ishii wrote:
>
> If I understand correctly, didn't you mention (or agreed?) that if fonts
> that are affected by the removed wording, such as Adobe Ming Std, become
> majority, we may revisit the discussion? It looks to me that the text
> describe such situation very well.

This was my understanding as well, and is recorded in the minutes here:
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0091.html

~fantasai