W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2013

Re: [css3-writing-modes] Examples of normal, unscaled glyphs work better than width-variant glyphs for text-combine-horizontal

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 16:59:23 -0700
Message-ID: <5240D5DB.4040709@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org
On 09/23/2013 01:03 PM, Koji Ishii wrote:
> Thank you for the feedback.
>
> - The "(proportional-width)" removed.
> - The term "OpenType implementation" changed.
> - The "sophisticated" removed.
>
>> I suggest that we simply omit this example.
>
> I think we once resolved to add your algorithm as an example,
> so it's easier to edit than remove. Hope this edits resolve
> all your feedback.

I've reviewed these edits, and agree that this should resolve
the issue around the incorrect assumptions in the previous
wording

John, as you review the text, please keep in mind that the UA
is not required to use width variants if the TCY fits within
1em without their use. Your wording here:
   > This example is inconsistent with the requirement to use
   > width variants when they are available
makes me think you are ignoring this fact.

~fantasai
Received on Monday, 23 September 2013 23:59:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:34 UTC