W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2013

(wrong string) €™s backdrop

From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 20:28:05 -0700
Message-ID: <CAGN7qDDTAJdfxFbjwfte75WO4r3VcSsQfzZFtRXH49ViOWxAXg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Cc: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>, Lea Verou <leaverou@gmail.com>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sep 18, 2013, at 4:33 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
> Blurring of the backdrop is not quite the same as a CSS image.
> You typically only want to blur where you're actually painting. For
> instance, if you draw large text or an SVG graphic, you only want to blur
> where the pixels of the text or graphic are drawn.
> I guess you could pull in the backdrop as a rectangular region of a
> certain size, but seems too primitive for CSS.
> The backdrop is whatever is behind the element, right? That can change,
> due to scrolling, resizing, dragging, animating, etc., and you'd want the
> blurring to continue to blur whatever is behind it.

Yes, since this is all declarative, the effect should look correct if the
content or its backdrop change. (Just like it should with blending)
Received on Thursday, 19 September 2013 03:28:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:32 UTC