- From: Sylvain Galineau <galineau@adobe.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 00:13:52 -0700
- To: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- CC: Jonathan Kew <jfkthame@googlemail.com>, John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>, Addison Phillips <addison@lab126.com>, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>, www International <www-international@w3.org>
On 9/15/13 1:28 PM, ""Martin J. Dürst"" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote: >On 2013/09/13 20:22, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Jonathan Kew<jfkthame@googlemail.com> >> wrote: >>> This is a tricky issue, IMO. What would it mean for the rendering >>>subsystem >>> to "treat lone surrogates as errors", exactly? >> >> Basically to treat them as if U+FFFD was passed. That's how we deal >> with them in the encoding layer and in character references and such. > >So that would mean that all lone surrogates render the same, and the >same as some other stuff? I think it would be better to show what's >there, because that may help in debugging. +1. If something is going to be shown, the hexbox option seems the most helpful.
Received on Tuesday, 17 September 2013 07:14:30 UTC