On 9/15/13 1:28 PM, ""Martin J. Dürst"" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote: >On 2013/09/13 20:22, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Jonathan Kew<jfkthame@googlemail.com> >> wrote: >>> This is a tricky issue, IMO. What would it mean for the rendering >>>subsystem >>> to "treat lone surrogates as errors", exactly? >> >> Basically to treat them as if U+FFFD was passed. That's how we deal >> with them in the encoding layer and in character references and such. > >So that would mean that all lone surrogates render the same, and the >same as some other stuff? I think it would be better to show what's >there, because that may help in debugging. +1. If something is going to be shown, the hexbox option seems the most helpful.Received on Tuesday, 17 September 2013 07:14:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:32 UTC