W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2013

Re: [CSSOM] Revisiting transforms and getBoundingClientRect()

From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 23:23:39 -0700
To: "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>
CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, Andrew Dupont <w3@andrewdupont.net>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <11FAC627-8BCB-4B59-9B23-CA3F0EC7BB24@adobe.com>

On Sep 15, 2013, at 7:59 AM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote:
> Alright, DOMPoint/DOMRect/DOMQuad works for me until someone else objects...
> 
> My understanding is that there's a consensus to rename ClientRect(List) to DOMRect(List) and use DOMMatrix/DOMPoint/DOMQuad. Is this recorded anywhere? If not, can someone please record it :-).

Yes, we resolved that the CSS WG prefers DOM prefixes for geometric APIs. [1]

Greetings,
Dirk

> 
> Rob
> -- 
> Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp  waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w  

[1] http://logs.csswg.org/irc.w3.org/css/?date=2013-09-12
Received on Sunday, 15 September 2013 06:24:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:34 UTC