Hello John, Friday, September 13, 2013, 1:59:44 PM, you wrote: > --On Thursday, September 12, 2013 18:54 +0100 Richard Ishida > <ishida@w3.org> wrote: >> 4.1. The @font-face rule >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-css-fonts-3-20130711/#font-face-r >> ule >> >> >> Editorial nit >> >> nit: "rather than limiting the font choice to a set of fonts >> available on all platforms" -> "rather than limiting the font >> choice to a set of fonts available on the user's platform" > Richard, > Sorry for not spotting this earlier, but it seems to me that > this is a little more subtle and the original text might be > correct (although confusing). > The following are all potentially different collections: > (1) The common set of fonts that all platform developers or > packagers have available have decided to include. This set is > volatile because a new platform could come along and its > designers could make different choices. But I think it is what > the original text says. 1A) The common set of fonts that many content developers incorrectly assume is available on all platforms. -- Best regards, Chris mailto:chris@w3.orgReceived on Friday, 13 September 2013 13:54:10 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:32 UTC