It's up to you. It's just that I found myself wondering whether the diagram was correct or whether an error had slipped in. I assumed that the explanation is what you mentioned, but wasn't completely sure. I'm happy whether or not you decide to make a change here. RI On 13/09/2013 02:19, John Daggett wrote: > > Richard Ishida wrote: > >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-css-fonts-3-20130711/#typography-background >> Typography Background >> >> Editorial >> >> figure 7 >> >> If there is supposed to be a blank in the bottom left corner, it may >> be good to note that. > > Font families don't always include faces for all combinations of > weight and width. I don't think commenting on that really adds > anything to this informative background section. > > Cheers, > > John Daggett > -- Richard IshidaReceived on Friday, 13 September 2013 05:46:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:32 UTC