On Sep 12, 2013, at 8:17 AM, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote: > > For a shape-outside URL that points to an SVG image, It would be the > rendering that determines the shape. That seems very odd. The SVG defines a shape path and you are defining a thicker path shape. I'd prefer you to honor the real shape defined by the path by default. >> For a fuzzier edge image (say, a picture of a smoke puff), I would most >> likely want my wrapping text to overlap some of the more translucent >> pixels, not being so far away that the wrapping area isn't even >> recognizable as being the same general shape. For shape-inside, I'd want >> a usable amount of space for the text. A 0.5 default would be much more >> likely to be useful in both cases. > > I disagree - I think that content should by default avoid any rendered > pixels of the image. I don't know why you would think that. Do you examples of that (perhaps from print), where the text is wrapping but refuses to overlap pixels (or halftone dots) of even a few percent of a blurry-edged shape? It seems like a rather extreme approach that would be the exception more than the rule.Received on Thursday, 12 September 2013 16:16:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:32 UTC