Re: [css-shapes] shape-image-threshold should be clearer about >= vs >

On Sep 11, 2013, at 8:43 AM, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote:

> The intended behavior is for the 0.0 initial value to enclose all of the
> pixels that are not fully transparent. I want that to be the behavior of
> the initial value, and I don't think picking an arbitrary amount of
> decimals for a 0.0001 initial value is a good idea.

Wouldn't 0.5 be a better default? Especially since when manually editing alpha masks it is easy to accidentally end up with a few stray pixels that are not fully transparent, against a field of other pixels that are. 

Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2013 18:03:45 UTC