W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2013

Re: [css-shapes] shape-image-threshold should be clearer about >= vs >

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:03:13 -0700
Message-Id: <2F9314B6-134E-4398-8751-8B2EC2F987A3@gmail.com>
Cc: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> 
On Sep 11, 2013, at 8:43 AM, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote:

> The intended behavior is for the 0.0 initial value to enclose all of the
> pixels that are not fully transparent. I want that to be the behavior of
> the initial value, and I don't think picking an arbitrary amount of
> decimals for a 0.0001 initial value is a good idea.

Wouldn't 0.5 be a better default? Especially since when manually editing alpha masks it is easy to accidentally end up with a few stray pixels that are not fully transparent, against a field of other pixels that are.
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2013 18:03:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:32 UTC