W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2013

Re: [css-shapes] shape-image-threshold should be clearer about >= vs >

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 18:00:29 +0200
To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20130911160029.GA22301@crum.dbaron.org>
On Wednesday 2013-09-11 08:43 -0700, Alan Stearns wrote:
> On 9/11/13 8:22 AM, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote:
> > * the Initial value doesn't describe the current behavior, so
> >   another value would be needed
> 
> The intended behavior is for the 0.0 initial value to enclose all of the
> pixels that are not fully transparent. I want that to be the behavior of
> the initial value, and I don't think picking an arbitrary amount of
> decimals for a 0.0001 initial value is a good idea.

But shouldn't the Initial Value lead to a behavior that matches the
behavior of existing floating images in CSS?

Or is there a separate property that toggles whether this property
does anything?

-David

-- 
𝄞   L. David Baron                         http://dbaron.org/   𝄂
𝄢   Mozilla                          https://www.mozilla.org/   𝄂
             Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
             What I was walling in or walling out,
             And to whom I was like to give offense.
               - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)

Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2013 16:01:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:34 UTC